· Plato, in his allegory of the cave, asserts that what a person sees as a real thing within this “reality” as only being “shadows” of a more vivid reality.
· Therefore Philosophic representation should be given as to the 2 dimensional form of the shadow and the 3 dimensional form of the object casting it. By doing this we can thus relate that what we see as 3 dimensional object as merely the shadow of 4th dimensional one.
· If we think in terms of any 4 dimensional object as being 3d dimensional, only dragged through time, we can relate a 4th dimensional object to something that has “been drawn“ by a 3d object. A dot on a piece of paper does not become a picture until it has been dragged upon the axes relative to the dimensional nature of the page using time. Therefore the structure of all 4 dimensional objects are like a snake whose innards consist of the same 3d object at different coordinates in both space and time. They are a picture that has been drawn by a 3 dimensional dot; a sphere.
· If we go back and look at the 2 dimensional shadow, cast by blocking out a source of light with a 3 dimensional object, we can see that the shadow, although being 2 dimensional in nature, can fall upon a 3 dimensional surface. It can expand and shrink its form instantaneously, simply by changing the position of the source of light that is being blocked. This is the underlying hint of how to perceive a 4th dimensional object, because even if we block a higher order of light, such as Ain Soph Aur, with a fourth dimensional object, the shadow cast will still be a 3d object, but it will in some ways affect the 4th dimensional reality. It also provides the biggest hint at our reality being false, because a 2d shadow is not real; it is an illusion caused by the comingling of 2 apparently real things, one being light, the other being an object. Thus we are provided with the biggest clue that reality is subjective to the dimension the object is being perceived, because once it is perceived from a higher dimension, its realness is succumbed to the fact that it is just a shadow of a more real object.
· If the 4th dimensional reality is nothing but 3d objects linked through time and space, then this would suggest that the 3d shadow would affect various aspects of other 4D objects at various points along the space/time axes. Thus a 4D object has the ability to “change” another 4D object in both the past and the future, depending on the nature of the 3D shadow the first casts. If we once again go back and analyse the 2D shadow falling upon a 3D surface, we come to realize that only the “outer appearance of the object covered by the shadow is affected; the internal structure remains the same, unless the shadow cools the object enough to change its temperature which, in a sense, is a quantum phenomenon. Thus, conceptually speaking, 4D objects are subject to being affected by unseen forces present within them, that can be changed depending on how a 3d shadow affects them.
· Again, analysis of the 2D shadow shows us that even if a 3D object remains still, its shadow will still move and change due the nature of light (for this argument we will assume only natural sources of light). We can thus assume a 3D shadow, such as ourselves, may be able to move with its 4D object remaining completely still, due to the moving light of the Ain Soph Aur, or it might be due to the moving of the actual object. Slow movement of the 3D Shadow would suggest a non-moving object, whilst fast moving would suggest it is, itself, moving. A combination of both is suggestive of something moving then stopping for periods of time. I point out that all animals are fast moving creatures, until they need to sleep, in which they slow down significantly. We can use this determination to suppose that natural, non moving 4D objects will cast 3D shadows that have a constant change in shape and size through time, and we can use the space taken by these 3d shadows for coordination. Once we understand this coordination, we can then use it to try and affect the 4d object using its unseen force. We, the “shadow”, change its “temperature” when it passes through the “space” we occupy. More importantly, we can understand that a shadow can be used to determine information about a world existing above the dimensions dictating its existence; a 2D shadow can be combined with a sundial to represent the angle of the earth’s spin in relation to the sun, what we equate to being hours.
· If we take a good look at the microcosm and macrocosm, we can see that there is a very obvious theme of “cycles” present ; atoms involve electrons that spin around the nucleus in a constant cycle, and our planets do a similar thing with our sun. In each of these environments, these repetitious cycles are necessary for creation to take place; if the electron stops spinning, matter falls apart; if the planets stop revolving around the sun, life dies off. By assuming the 4D world is also composed of such cycles, we can assume there to be some sort of constant cycle that dictates the existence of 4D objects. Thus if we understand these cycles, we can theoretically use 3D shadows to provide more information on them. All we need to do is identify an unmoving 4D object and study it in relation to its cycle.
Comments